26 April 2008

Political support and voting in Northern Ireland

Recently I wrote a paper with the snappy title ‘Political identity and support in Northern Ireland politics 1998 – 2006’, on behalf of Labour's Northern Ireland Constituency Council, for the Labour Party Commission on Northern Ireland. It’s an updated version of statistics from some work I did in 2005 at QUB’s Institute of Governance. I applied for funding for an action research project to try to bring together people from the different ‘third space’ political parties (neither nationalist nor unionist) in order to try to develop this aspect of Northern Ireland politics. We held a well-attended seminar at which there was clearly a lot of support for the project, but we didn’t succeed in getting any cash for it.

I recall a visit from an English charitable trust to which we’d applied. Their staff member, who dealt with all their Irish applications, asked some very pertinent questions and was clearly very aware of the issues. He was accompanied by an Englishwoman from their board of governors, who kept on asking why we needed money to get people to talk to each other. Put that woman on the Community Relations Council right now, I say.

Here are the summary points from the report, which covered the years 1998 - 2006:

· A substantial proportion of people, ranging from 30 – 40 per cent, do not describe themselves as unionist or nationalist. The proportion is increasing slightly over time.
· Over the same period, when asked which party they support, many people either support no party (between 11 and 26 per cent over the years) or don’t know (5 – 18 per cent).
· During the period 1998 – 2006, support for unionist and nationalist parties combined reached a low of 56 per cent in 2006 and never rose above 69 per cent.
· In elections, the 30 – 40 per cent of the population who do not support the communal parties reduces to a band of generally around 5 – 7 per cent who turn out to vote.
· There may be many reasons for this and turnout is not unusually low compared with other parts of the UK and with the Irish Republic. We cannot assume that they point exclusively to the possibility of a gap in the electoral ‘market place’.
· However, in 2005, 41 per cent of respondents had a lot of sympathy with the statement from non-voters that ‘I would have voted if there was a strong non-sectarian party’.
· It would be reasonable to conclude that at least some of the missing voters cannot identify a current political party they wish to support.

I’m a lot more cautious about the results than I was in 2005. As I say above, there may be many reasons why people in NI don’t vote, describe themselves as unionist or nationalist, or support a political party. One reason is the possibility that they don’t tell the truth to survey interviewers, a subject which is not treated seriously enough by social researchers. Still, there is a gap and that means there is potential for a new political party to gain support and votes.

8 comments:

Fate's Granddaughter said...

I am using similar information in one aspect of my research. It is such an important issue for me both professionally and personally. Although I am not entitled to vote in NI until the end of this year, my husband 'shares' his vote with me - we discuss the issues and make a decision together. I can't tell you how difficult we find choosing a candidate who we feel represents us. If only we still had the Women's Coalition!

Jenny Muir said...

There must be a lot of people in your situation, FG - I'm sure some people aren't telling the truth about who they vote for, and others of course vote tactically at the time (I've certainly done this - but of course this still leaves lots of others, as I said. Not sure about the NIWC myself, they were a great catalyst in the GFA negotiations but I wasn't quite sure what else they had going for them apart from being women, which might be why they didn't survive 'peace'.

Fate's Granddaughter said...

I think at the time NIWC appealed to me because they seemed to be the only party talking about issues in a non-secular way. My willingness to quickly jump on their bandwagon is perhaps a testimony to the need for more independent parties.

Jenny Muir said...

Yes, perhaps I was a little harsh there! It'll be interesting to see how the new few years go, with the Greens, Alliance (getting more radical IMO, and very good on diversity) and possibly Labour coming along too. Maybe between us we can form a 'radical centre' i.e. radical in a left/ right sense but centre in a community background sense. If that makes any sense.

Democratic-Centre said...

I think Northern Ireland requires new approaches post-GFA Jenny. I have been thinking along those lines like you suggest Centrist constitutional positions with a left-social policy.

However, current politics is still very egotistical and that is prevalent throughout all the parties, a case in point is the zealous guarding of the 'Opposition' which is not a good idea and is something that stood out to highlight the egotisticial nature of things.

It's a good post, well worth further debate but I cant help but think a working up from grassroots sown from new seed is required. Schools, university and onwards, utilising the space from political peace to hatch new ideas. It's getting the stickiness to create momentum and people really are pressed for time and that's when leadership and good interpersonal skills come into play.

Our egotistical politicians hamper the interpersonal approach. New start if you ask me.

Jenny Muir said...

DC - good points, but where does the new start start? 'Peace' provides new opportunities for people to get involved in politics who quite understandably wouldn't have before, but in the short term they will have to engage with the poeple who are in power now. This requires vision and a long-term approach.

And I don't think we'll ever get rid of egotistical politicians, which is why every party needs a strong grass roots to keep them in order.

CiarĂ¡n said...

Is Labour considered a 'third space' party? It's seen in Scotland and Wales as a unionist party, why would that be any different in the Six Counties?

Jenny Muir said...

Ciaran - Perhaps I shoudl have made it plainer that I'm talking about the Irish LP not the British LP, so our problem might be more the opposite, i.e. that we'd be seen as a nationalist party. But we're trying to get away from being defined in these terms, see:

http://www.labour.ie/northernireland/statement2006.html

It's not that we try to ignore the border, but it's increasingly irrelevant to the lives of everyone on the island at the moment - although of course for many (not all) it's important culturally to be seem as Irish or British. There's more in the link, but perhaps I should expend on this fuether in a separate post? But to start - I've said in various forms that I have yet to have it explained to me how my life will be better or worse depending upon which capitalist state I live in, the Republic or the UK.