Keep the Red Flag flying for democratic socialism
I enjoyed the Labour Party Conference in Wexford last weekend - but quietly, as my drinking and carousing days are over. Most of the worthy list of motions were agreed unanimously, bringing home the fact that we’re not able to implement any of them as we’re not in government. I was expecting more analysis of the last election performance, but this has been wrapped up into a ‘Commission on 21st Century Labour’, which will report to the next conference.
My highlights included:
· A mature debate on drugs policy, prompted by a range of motions including one to legalise cannabis. Another Commission looms, but rightly so as it’s a complex issue.
· An informed and passionate debate on an amendment to the Party Constitution, proposing to replace references to Labour as a ‘democratic socialist party’ with ‘social democratic party’. If you are the sort of person who would rather have your teeth pulled out than attend a political event, this is the kind of thing that makes you despair. But in fact it’s at the heart of socialist ideology and I heard it described as our Clause IV moment. In this case democratic socialism stayed, to a roar of approval.
· The classic line from Eamon Gilmore: ‘Eamon de Valera would never have taken fistfuls of cash in a suitcase’.
· The decision to adopt the Red Flag as the Party anthem. Now I’ll have to learn the words.
· So many young people attending and contributing actively through speaking and standing for the NEC, plus a packed Labour Youth fringe meeting.
· The comradely nature of debate and generally good-tempered and upbeat atmosphere.
And of course there was the motion and fringe meeting concerning the Commission on the future of Labour in Northern Ireland. The motion was proposed by Ruairi Quinn on behalf of the NEC and seconded by Mark Langhammer from the NI Labour Forum (pictured). Quinn made his position crystal clear: we could look at change but that the relationship with the SDLP was paramount. Speakers who still don’t understand why some of us are not in the SDLP welcomed the opportunity to strengthen the relationship between the two parties, with one suggesting we ‘build the centre’ in NI to include the SDLP, the UUP and other parties except the DUP and Sinn Féin; but by implication not including Irish Labour. The reason the motion was passed was because it didn’t commit the party to doing anything except exploring the issues.
The fringe meeting continued the discussion in a level-headed manner which bodes well for the operation of the Commission. But it’s frustrating to be asked ‘have you thought this through?’ about the Border and the national question, when in the Labour Forum’s first few years we talked of little else. Supportive platform speakers emphasised the benefits to Labour of being an all-Ireland party, but also that we all respect the position of the SDLP and that any changes such as standing in elections would be gradual. SDLP members welcomed the opportunity for debate, and we were assured that discussions with Fianna Fáil were just that and no more.
So we have our Commission, but I’m not sure the outcome will be to the liking of Northern Labour members. The intensifying links between the SDLP and Fianna Fáil have had no impact on the relationship between the SDLP and Irish Labour at senior level. It seems to me that the future of Irish Labour in the North depends very much on what the SDLP does next.
DEVELOPING THE LABOUR PARTY IN NORTHERN IRELAND: SHOULD LABOUR WAIT AGAIN?
